An investigation into the negligence of Seongnam FC by the National Audit Office of the National Police Agency

Head of National Investigation Headquarters “Name in accordance with procedures”… Police Commissioner “I will check the deficiencies”

On the 7th, at the inspection of the National Police Agency by the Administrative Security Committee of the National Assembly, the opposition party and opposition parties criticized the police investigation for poor performance in relation to a politically sensitive case.

The opposition and opposition parties urged the police to carry out an active investigation with one voice, but the target was different.

People’s Power members pointed to the police investigation into the Seongnam FC sponsorship case involving Lee Jae-myung, the leader of the Democratic Party.

The Gyeonggi Bundang Police Station decided not to appeal the Seongnam FC donation case in September last year, but in August, the Gyeonggi Nambu Police Agency reported that Lee and the former CEO of Doosan E&C were accused of bribing the sent case at

The prosecution, which took over the case, is expanding the scope of the investigation beyond Doosan E&C to the entire sponsorship company.

On that day, members of the ruling party drew attention to the fact that the first investigation by the police who decided not to appeal was not good enough.

People’s Strength Representative Park Seong-min said, “After receiving the complaint in 2018, the Bundang Police Station decided not to appeal after three years of investigation.”

He said, “It can be seen as a blatantly negligent investigation. Now that the police have grown in power and authority, I hope they will become completely independent from politics and be reborn as a police force for the people.”

Commissioner Yoon Hee-geun said, “At that time, it was reported that the Bundang Police Station also did their best to investigate.

I understand that the decision not to appeal was made on the basis of the witness’s evidence.” “After that, there was a change in the statement of the person involved in the case, and the judgment has changed as evidence to match this. released.”

Nam Gu-jun, head of the National Investigation Headquarters, also explained, “During the supplementary investigation process, city officials and corporate officials were investigated.

When Representative Hae-sik Lee of the Democratic Party of Korea asked, “Did you send the case to the prosecution based on the new statement?” Nam’s General Manager said, “Yes.

I got a statement that there was a price to pay.”

In response to an attack by members of the ruling party, members of the Democratic Party countered suspicions of preferential treatment for the development of the Gongheung district in Yangpyeong around President Yoon Seok-yeol’s wife.

The claim is that in 2016, in the process of changing 22,411 square meters of Gongheung-ri, Yangpyeong-gun, Gyeonggi-do, from public development to private development, ESI&D, the family company of President Yoon’s mother-in-law, was receive various preferential treatment.

Kim Gyo-heung, a member of the Democratic Party, said, “I also said last year, but despite the (related) audit report from the Gyeonggi-do government office, the police investigation is very sluggish.”

Representative Cheon Jun-ho from the same party also claimed, “No matter who sees it, it seems that the president’s mother-in-law has been ‘investigated’.

Director Nam said, “We are investigating the situation as per procedure, and we are continuing to review necessary measures.”

“The necessary measures include summoning and investigating those involved,” he explained.

The Democratic Party also disagreed with Kim Kun-hee’s acquittal of false career charges.

Democratic Party lawmaker Jo Eung-cheon presented the police’s decision not to appeal, saying, “We made the decision not to appeal, relying only on Mrs. Kim’s one-sided statement.

“The investigation was incomplete,” he said.

In response, Nam’s General Manager explained, “The content of some resumes appears to be different from the facts.”

The Eastar Jet hiring corruption case, which is suspected of involving many current opposition figures, was also mentioned in the head of the National Assembly.

In this case, doubts were raised about the poor police investigation as the prosecution, sent by the police, secured a computer containing personnel data as new evidence.

People’s Strength Representative Jo Eun-hee said, “I said I couldn’t secure it because I didn’t know where, but the computer was still in the Eastar Jet office.” “The company also had 2018 personnel data. intranet.

It is a clearly negligent investigation where the police neglected to find evidence.”

Commissioner Yoon replied, “We are checking the facts to see if there are any flaws in the investigation at the time.”

/happy news

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.