According to Article 144 of the Constitution, the country’s authorities are responsible for implementing the judgments of the Supreme Court. However, there are police officers who do not obey the Supreme Court? It is clear again and again that there is. This is evidenced by Section 66A of the Information Technology (IT) Act. In 2012, a law student named Shreya Singhal approached the Supreme Court with a Public Interest Litigation against Section 66A of the IT Act. Here was the background: Section 66A provided for imprisonment for up to three years and a fine for making inflammatory remarks. A boy named Shaheen Dhada posted a comment on social media against Mumbai’s decision to come to a standstill when Shiv Sena leader Bal Thackeray died. A kid named Rinu Sreen liked him. Both were arrested by the police in Palghar, Maharashtra. Section 66A Applicable. It was then that Shreya petitioned the Supreme Court to examine the constitutional validity of this section.
